<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29192</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 7,437.86, not the entire amount of Rs. 25,655. The expenditure was considered a revenue expenditure related to the business, and the liability was not personal. The timing of the deduction was based on the actual payment made during the relevant accounting year. As neither party wholly succeeded, there was no order as to costs in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29192</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 7,437.86, not the entire amount of Rs. 25,655. The expenditure was considered a revenue expenditure related to the business, and the liability was not personal. The timing of the deduction was based on the actual payment made during the relevant accounting year. As neither party wholly succeeded, there was no order as to costs in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>