<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s concerns about the share premium were deemed unfounded as the source of funds was accepted, leading to the conclusion that section 68 did not apply when the source of funds was not in question. The Tribunal emphasized the genuineness of the funds and upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer&#039;s concerns about the share premium were deemed unfounded as the source of funds was accepted, leading to the conclusion that section 68 did not apply when the source of funds was not in question. The Tribunal emphasized the genuineness of the funds and upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>