<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 564 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 30% of the gross on-money receipts, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal found the estimation of profit percentage at 30% just and proper, in line with judicial precedents and market practices. The rejection of the Settlement Commission application was upheld due to substantial understatement of income. The assessee&#039;s request for cross-examination was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 564 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 30% of the gross on-money receipts, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal found the estimation of profit percentage at 30% just and proper, in line with judicial precedents and market practices. The rejection of the Settlement Commission application was upheld due to substantial understatement of income. The assessee&#039;s request for cross-examination was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>