<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 560 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of ESI/PF contributions deposited before the filing of returns. The delay in filing the appeals was condoned due to COVID-19, and the appeals were to be decided on merits based on existing records. The decision was influenced by judicial precedents and interpretations of relevant amendments to the Income Tax Act, despite the amendments not applying to the assessment years in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 560 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of ESI/PF contributions deposited before the filing of returns. The delay in filing the appeals was condoned due to COVID-19, and the appeals were to be decided on merits based on existing records. The decision was influenced by judicial precedents and interpretations of relevant amendments to the Income Tax Act, despite the amendments not applying to the assessment years in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>