https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423715 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the lack of suppression, reasonableness of adjusting excess duty paid, and absence of evidence for unjust enrichment. The appellant's practice of adjusting excess duty against subsequent liabilities was considered reasonable, especially since it was discontinued in May 2016. The appeal was allowed on grounds of limitation and merits, with consequential relief granted. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:08:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423715 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the lack of suppression, reasonableness of adjusting excess duty paid, and absence of evidence for unjust enrichment. The appellant's practice of adjusting excess duty against subsequent liabilities was considered reasonable, especially since it was discontinued in May 2016. The appeal was allowed on grounds of limitation and merits, with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423715