<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29190</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the notice dated March 9, 1978, and the proceedings initiated based on it. The court emphasized the necessity for the ITO to have valid reasons to issue notices under section 148 and highlighted the importance of full and true disclosure of material facts for accurate assessment. The petitioner&#039;s contentions regarding jurisdiction and disclosure were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the notice and associated proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29190</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the notice dated March 9, 1978, and the proceedings initiated based on it. The court emphasized the necessity for the ITO to have valid reasons to issue notices under section 148 and highlighted the importance of full and true disclosure of material facts for accurate assessment. The petitioner&#039;s contentions regarding jurisdiction and disclosure were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the notice and associated proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>