https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423704 A Tribunal examined whether parties had wilfully disobeyed a recorded compromise and later directions requiring discharge of the company's liability and protection of the petitioners' personal property. The record reflected repeated non-compliance, including failure to act on directions to pay ARCIL, and the respondents' reliance on alleged breaches by the petitioners did not excuse disobedience of subsisting orders. On the facts recorded, the conduct was treated as deliberate and wilful, resulting in contempt liability and directions for payment with interest, failing which imprisonment and fines were stipulated. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:43:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423704 A Tribunal examined whether parties had wilfully disobeyed a recorded compromise and later directions requiring discharge of the company's liability and protection of the petitioners' personal property. The record reflected repeated non-compliance, including failure to act on directions to pay ARCIL, and the respondents' reliance on alleged breaches by the petitioners did not excuse disobedience of subsisting orders. On the facts recorded, the conduct was treated as deliberate and wilful, resulting in contempt liability and directions for payment with interest, failing which imprisonment and fines were stipulated. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423704