<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on premium to the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation for insuring bank deposits is admissible as CENVAT credit because deposit insurance qualifies as an input service. The analysis follows the Larger Bench view and the assessee&#039;s earlier case, both recognising the service as creditable under the CENVAT scheme. On that basis, the disallowance was held unsustainable, and the demand, interest and penalty were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on premium to the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation for insuring bank deposits is admissible as CENVAT credit because deposit insurance qualifies as an input service. The analysis follows the Larger Bench view and the assessee&#039;s earlier case, both recognising the service as creditable under the CENVAT scheme. On that basis, the disallowance was held unsustainable, and the demand, interest and penalty were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>