<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the decision that disallowed the appellant-bank from availing credit for Service Tax paid on deposit insurance services provided by DICGC. The Tribunal held that the credit was indeed eligible based on legal precedents and interpretations, setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed. This judgment clarified the eligibility of the appellant-bank to claim such credits, emphasizing compliance with tax laws and regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the decision that disallowed the appellant-bank from availing credit for Service Tax paid on deposit insurance services provided by DICGC. The Tribunal held that the credit was indeed eligible based on legal precedents and interpretations, setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed. This judgment clarified the eligibility of the appellant-bank to claim such credits, emphasizing compliance with tax laws and regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>