<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1686 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the appellant to avail benefits under both Notification No. 30/2004 and Notification No. 29/2004 concurrently, provided the conditions of each notification were met. The case was remanded to the original authority for verification of compliance with the notification conditions, allowing the appellant to submit further evidence if required. Compliance with the conditions of the notifications for simultaneous benefits was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 21:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1686 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the appellant to avail benefits under both Notification No. 30/2004 and Notification No. 29/2004 concurrently, provided the conditions of each notification were met. The case was remanded to the original authority for verification of compliance with the notification conditions, allowing the appellant to submit further evidence if required. Compliance with the conditions of the notifications for simultaneous benefits was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>