<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1686 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</link>
    <description>Simultaneous exemption benefits under separate notifications for domestic clearances and exports may be available where each notification is read as operating in its own field and the prescribed conditions are independently satisfied. The Board circulars indicate that the manufacturer must maintain separate books of account and correctly handle input credit in accordance with each notification&#039;s requirements. Compliance is fact-specific and requires verification on the record; the matter was therefore remanded to the original authority to examine whether the conditions for both notifications had been met after giving the appellant an opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 21:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1686 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</link>
      <description>Simultaneous exemption benefits under separate notifications for domestic clearances and exports may be available where each notification is read as operating in its own field and the prescribed conditions are independently satisfied. The Board circulars indicate that the manufacturer must maintain separate books of account and correctly handle input credit in accordance with each notification&#039;s requirements. Compliance is fact-specific and requires verification on the record; the matter was therefore remanded to the original authority to examine whether the conditions for both notifications had been met after giving the appellant an opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>