<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1249 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302700</link>
    <description>A refund order was challenged in writ jurisdiction on the basis that the petitioner later obtained additional material said to support refund entitlement. The Court held that the order had to be assessed on the material available when it was made, and the later material did not show illegality or wrongfulness in the State GST authorities&#039; decision. On the record before it, no basis was found to interfere with the refund order, and writ relief was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1249 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302700</link>
      <description>A refund order was challenged in writ jurisdiction on the basis that the petitioner later obtained additional material said to support refund entitlement. The Court held that the order had to be assessed on the material available when it was made, and the later material did not show illegality or wrongfulness in the State GST authorities&#039; decision. On the record before it, no basis was found to interfere with the refund order, and writ relief was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>