<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 408 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302692</link>
    <description>The High Court found the trial court&#039;s decision erroneous in five criminal appeals related to dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the complaint filed by one of the partners was maintainable, emphasizing the presumption under Section 139. The court overturned the acquittal, directing a fresh decision and further proceedings at the Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 408 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302692</link>
      <description>The High Court found the trial court&#039;s decision erroneous in five criminal appeals related to dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the complaint filed by one of the partners was maintainable, emphasizing the presumption under Section 139. The court overturned the acquittal, directing a fresh decision and further proceedings at the Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>