https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691 Issuance of summons was held vitiated because the complainant had not complied with the mandatory condition in Section 204(2) CrPC to file a list of prosecution witnesses before process was issued. In the absence of such a list, or a memo stating that only the complainant would be examined, the statutory precondition for taking cognizance and issuing summons was not satisfied. The summons order was set aside and the matter remitted to the Magistrate for fresh consideration after compliance. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:15:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691 Issuance of summons was held vitiated because the complainant had not complied with the mandatory condition in Section 204(2) CrPC to file a list of prosecution witnesses before process was issued. In the absence of such a list, or a memo stating that only the complainant would be examined, the statutory precondition for taking cognizance and issuing summons was not satisfied. The summons order was set aside and the matter remitted to the Magistrate for fresh consideration after compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691