https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Magistrate's order for issuing process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to doubts regarding proper notice of dishonor of the cheque. Additionally, the court found a violation of Section 204(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for not filing a list of prosecution witnesses, emphasizing the mandatory nature of this requirement. The case was remitted for compliance with the procedural obligations, ensuring a fair legal process going forward. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:15:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Magistrate's order for issuing process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to doubts regarding proper notice of dishonor of the cheque. Additionally, the court found a violation of Section 204(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for not filing a list of prosecution witnesses, emphasizing the mandatory nature of this requirement. The case was remitted for compliance with the procedural obligations, ensuring a fair legal process going forward. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302691