<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 501 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition No. (IB) - 1713 of 2018 due to a &quot;Pre-existing dispute&quot; between the parties. The Tribunal found the dispute genuine and in need of further investigation, following the criteria set by the Supreme Court in the Mobilox case. Consequently, the petition was deemed inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 501 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition No. (IB) - 1713 of 2018 due to a &quot;Pre-existing dispute&quot; between the parties. The Tribunal found the dispute genuine and in need of further investigation, following the criteria set by the Supreme Court in the Mobilox case. Consequently, the petition was deemed inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>