<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on both grounds. The assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the delay in obtaining the completion certificate was beyond its control. Additionally, the compensation paid to flat owners for delayed possession was considered a legitimate business expenditure and was allowed as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1665 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on both grounds. The assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the delay in obtaining the completion certificate was beyond its control. Additionally, the compensation paid to flat owners for delayed possession was considered a legitimate business expenditure and was allowed as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>