<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1314 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that there was no deliberate misstatement in the prospectus and the utilization of IPO proceeds in ICDs did not violate ICDR Regulations. The Tribunal found the WTM&#039;s conclusions lacked evidence and were based on surmises. All appeals were allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1314 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that there was no deliberate misstatement in the prospectus and the utilization of IPO proceeds in ICDs did not violate ICDR Regulations. The Tribunal found the WTM&#039;s conclusions lacked evidence and were based on surmises. All appeals were allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>