<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1930 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302676</link>
    <description>The court held that an unregistered partnership firm can be brought within the purview of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint under Section 138 cannot be maintained against the partners without making the partnership firm an accused. The court quashed the proceedings as the complaint did not comply with the law, requiring the partnership firm to be included as an accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 20:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1930 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302676</link>
      <description>The court held that an unregistered partnership firm can be brought within the purview of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint under Section 138 cannot be maintained against the partners without making the partnership firm an accused. The court quashed the proceedings as the complaint did not comply with the law, requiring the partnership firm to be included as an accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>