https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302668 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decree in favor of the idol represented by a worshipper in a property possession suit against the Shebait's alienation. The Court upheld that the transaction was not binding on the idol, stating inadequate consideration. It confirmed the worshipper's right to represent the idol, as the relief sought was outside Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court established that worshippers can represent idols when Shebaits fail to protect their interests, emphasizing the idol's legal personality and property rights. The appeal was dismissed, clarifying the legal position of idols and worshippers in such cases. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:20:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302668 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decree in favor of the idol represented by a worshipper in a property possession suit against the Shebait's alienation. The Court upheld that the transaction was not binding on the idol, stating inadequate consideration. It confirmed the worshipper's right to represent the idol, as the relief sought was outside Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court established that worshippers can represent idols when Shebaits fail to protect their interests, emphasizing the idol's legal personality and property rights. The appeal was dismissed, clarifying the legal position of idols and worshippers in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302668