<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 986 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and department&#039;s appeals. The Assessing Officer&#039;s acceptance of the rectification application led to the withdrawal of appeals, as the issues raised were resolved. The ld. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions was upheld, finding no reason to interfere. The denial of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(iii) was justified due to the filed loss. The appeals were deemed infructuous and dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 986 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and department&#039;s appeals. The Assessing Officer&#039;s acceptance of the rectification application led to the withdrawal of appeals, as the issues raised were resolved. The ld. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions was upheld, finding no reason to interfere. The denial of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(iii) was justified due to the filed loss. The appeals were deemed infructuous and dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>