https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302662 The NCLT held that repeated failure to file a reply after multiple opportunities justified closing the respondent's right to reply, especially in insolvency proceedings where the statutory timeline must be maintained. It further held that it had no power to recall or review its own procedural order once findings had been recorded, and that the proper remedy against such an order was an appellate challenge rather than a recall application before the same Tribunal. Reference to Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules was not accepted as a source of recall jurisdiction. The request to restore the right to file the reply was therefore rejected and the application was dismissed. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:19:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302662 The NCLT held that repeated failure to file a reply after multiple opportunities justified closing the respondent's right to reply, especially in insolvency proceedings where the statutory timeline must be maintained. It further held that it had no power to recall or review its own procedural order once findings had been recorded, and that the proper remedy against such an order was an appellate challenge rather than a recall application before the same Tribunal. Reference to Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules was not accepted as a source of recall jurisdiction. The request to restore the right to file the reply was therefore rejected and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302662