<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and directing the AO to delete the additions. The reassessment proceedings were deemed baseless as they lacked new material facts. The Tribunal found the creditors to be genuine, supported by substantial evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons and evidence in such assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 22:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and directing the AO to delete the additions. The reassessment proceedings were deemed baseless as they lacked new material facts. The Tribunal found the creditors to be genuine, supported by substantial evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons and evidence in such assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>