https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423627 The case involved disputes regarding liability under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, correct reversal of credit amounts, interpretation of Rule 6, applicability of amendments, segregation of credit between eligible and ineligible input services, and re-computation of credit reversal for the year 2014-15. The appellant's appeal was disposed of by remanding the case back to the original authority for re-computation of credit reversal for the year 2014-15. The Tribunal clarified that the exercise should be limited to 2014-15 as the demand for the earlier year was set aside. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423627 The case involved disputes regarding liability under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, correct reversal of credit amounts, interpretation of Rule 6, applicability of amendments, segregation of credit between eligible and ineligible input services, and re-computation of credit reversal for the year 2014-15. The appellant's appeal was disposed of by remanding the case back to the original authority for re-computation of credit reversal for the year 2014-15. The Tribunal clarified that the exercise should be limited to 2014-15 as the demand for the earlier year was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423627