<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 466 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423625</link>
    <description>The HC allowed an appeal against a GST order that violated natural justice principles. The appellant received a show cause notice on 29.03.2022 with seven days to respond, but the authority issued its order on 31.03.2022, prematurely cutting short the response period. The Court set aside both the Single Judge&#039;s dismissal and the GST order dated 31.03.2022, directing that this order be treated as a show cause notice. The appellant was given ten days to submit objections, with instructions for the authority to provide a personal hearing before passing a fresh order on merits. The bank guarantee was maintained pending the authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 466 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423625</link>
      <description>The HC allowed an appeal against a GST order that violated natural justice principles. The appellant received a show cause notice on 29.03.2022 with seven days to respond, but the authority issued its order on 31.03.2022, prematurely cutting short the response period. The Court set aside both the Single Judge&#039;s dismissal and the GST order dated 31.03.2022, directing that this order be treated as a show cause notice. The appellant was given ten days to submit objections, with instructions for the authority to provide a personal hearing before passing a fresh order on merits. The bank guarantee was maintained pending the authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>