<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 464 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423623</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the petitioner&#039;s request to set aside the freezing of three bank accounts maintained at different banks. The Court also directed the petitioner&#039;s counsel to include the jurisdictional Commissionerate as a party for addressing the issue of the blocked Electronic Credit Ledger in future proceedings. The matter was scheduled for the next hearing, and all parties, including the banks involved, were instructed to comply with the Court&#039;s orders digitally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 464 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423623</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the petitioner&#039;s request to set aside the freezing of three bank accounts maintained at different banks. The Court also directed the petitioner&#039;s counsel to include the jurisdictional Commissionerate as a party for addressing the issue of the blocked Electronic Credit Ledger in future proceedings. The matter was scheduled for the next hearing, and all parties, including the banks involved, were instructed to comply with the Court&#039;s orders digitally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>