<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 452 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423611</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The addition for the cash balance mismatch was deleted as it did not conclusively indicate unaccounted income. Similarly, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable after the quantum addition forming its basis was overturned. The ITAT&#039;s detailed analysis and legal interpretation led to the favorable outcome for the assessee in both matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 452 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423611</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The addition for the cash balance mismatch was deleted as it did not conclusively indicate unaccounted income. Similarly, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable after the quantum addition forming its basis was overturned. The ITAT&#039;s detailed analysis and legal interpretation led to the favorable outcome for the assessee in both matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>