<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in a case concerning the enhancement of assessable value on an import of a rubber accelerator. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the re-valuation process, including lack of proper notice and justification, reliance on a single bill of entry, and failure to comply with Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice, the Tribunal concluded that the rejection of declared value lacked evidentiary support, leading to a breach of procedural fairness. Despite procedural flaws, the appeal was granted based on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:25:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in a case concerning the enhancement of assessable value on an import of a rubber accelerator. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the re-valuation process, including lack of proper notice and justification, reliance on a single bill of entry, and failure to comply with Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice, the Tribunal concluded that the rejection of declared value lacked evidentiary support, leading to a breach of procedural fairness. Despite procedural flaws, the appeal was granted based on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>