https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423590 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that their activities, including camp mobilization, construction, and maintenance, did not fall within the 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral' service category as alleged. Citing previous judgments and a Commissioner's ruling in the appellant's favor, the Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the appellant's activities, which were deemed more related to camp establishment and maintenance rather than surveying or exploration of minerals. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:24:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423590 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that their activities, including camp mobilization, construction, and maintenance, did not fall within the 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral' service category as alleged. Citing previous judgments and a Commissioner's ruling in the appellant's favor, the Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the appellant's activities, which were deemed more related to camp establishment and maintenance rather than surveying or exploration of minerals. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423590