https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302649 Preventive detention was not invalidated by delay in execution or in considering representations, because the authorities had pursued service of the order and the representations were processed through the statutory advisory mechanism without unacceptable delay. The detention was nevertheless set aside because Article 22(5) and the detention scheme require relied upon material to be supplied in a meaningful form: merely giving the CCTV compact disc without a workable facility to view it was insufficient, and the failure to furnish the earlier favourable judgment deprived the detenu of an effective opportunity to represent his case. The omitted material formed part of the basis of detention, causing prejudice and vitiating continued detention. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 19:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302649 Preventive detention was not invalidated by delay in execution or in considering representations, because the authorities had pursued service of the order and the representations were processed through the statutory advisory mechanism without unacceptable delay. The detention was nevertheless set aside because Article 22(5) and the detention scheme require relied upon material to be supplied in a meaningful form: merely giving the CCTV compact disc without a workable facility to view it was insufficient, and the failure to furnish the earlier favourable judgment deprived the detenu of an effective opportunity to represent his case. The omitted material formed part of the basis of detention, causing prejudice and vitiating continued detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302649