<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1397 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled against the Assessing Officer in both instances, upholding the decisions of the First Appellate Authority regarding the disallowance of material and labour/contingency expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper reasoning and evidence, stating that additions cannot be made without justification or concrete proof against the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted that tax liabilities cannot be imposed based on estimation alone and confirmed that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1397 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled against the Assessing Officer in both instances, upholding the decisions of the First Appellate Authority regarding the disallowance of material and labour/contingency expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper reasoning and evidence, stating that additions cannot be made without justification or concrete proof against the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted that tax liabilities cannot be imposed based on estimation alone and confirmed that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>