<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 696 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302638</link>
    <description>Disclosure of the material actually relied upon satisfies natural justice; the Tribunal held that furnishing the relevant trade and order extracts and linkage chart was sufficient, and no prejudice was shown from non-supply of the full investigation record. Repeated synchronized, circular and reversal trades between interconnected parties over the trading period were treated as indicative of manipulation designed to create artificial volumes, so the finding of fraudulent and manipulative trading was upheld. The restraint order was therefore sustained and the regulatory action remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 696 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302638</link>
      <description>Disclosure of the material actually relied upon satisfies natural justice; the Tribunal held that furnishing the relevant trade and order extracts and linkage chart was sufficient, and no prejudice was shown from non-supply of the full investigation record. Repeated synchronized, circular and reversal trades between interconnected parties over the trading period were treated as indicative of manipulation designed to create artificial volumes, so the finding of fraudulent and manipulative trading was upheld. The restraint order was therefore sustained and the regulatory action remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>