https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302639 Daily-rated, casual and N.M.R. workers are not automatically entitled to the same wages and allowances as regularly appointed employees merely because they perform similar work. Pay parity depends on the broader service conditions, including recruitment terms, qualifications, status, responsibilities and the incidents of regular employment. The Court found no sufficient factual basis to presume equivalence in duties and rejected reliance on a cited decision as governing equal pay for N.M.R. workers, while treating the earlier directly applicable precedent as denying parity between daily-rated workers and regular staff. Until regularization, the workers were entitled only to the minimum wages prescribed or notified, if higher than the amount already paid. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302639 Daily-rated, casual and N.M.R. workers are not automatically entitled to the same wages and allowances as regularly appointed employees merely because they perform similar work. Pay parity depends on the broader service conditions, including recruitment terms, qualifications, status, responsibilities and the incidents of regular employment. The Court found no sufficient factual basis to presume equivalence in duties and rejected reliance on a cited decision as governing equal pay for N.M.R. workers, while treating the earlier directly applicable precedent as denying parity between daily-rated workers and regular staff. Until regularization, the workers were entitled only to the minimum wages prescribed or notified, if higher than the amount already paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302639