https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302637 Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 requires an award within two years of the declaration, and only the period covered by a subsisting court stay can be excluded. Where earlier writ petitions had already been dismissed and no injunction remained in force, delay beyond the statutory period could not be justified by reference to those proceedings or to urgency notifications. On the stated facts, possession had not been taken within time and the land had not vested as contended, so the acquisition was treated as having lapsed and relief followed. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 11:38:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302637 Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 requires an award within two years of the declaration, and only the period covered by a subsisting court stay can be excluded. Where earlier writ petitions had already been dismissed and no injunction remained in force, delay beyond the statutory period could not be justified by reference to those proceedings or to urgency notifications. On the stated facts, possession had not been taken within time and the land had not vested as contended, so the acquisition was treated as having lapsed and relief followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302637