https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423582 The HC granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(10)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 for alleged fraudulent ITC claims through fake firms. After being in custody since 29.09.2021, the court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of evidence connecting them to the alleged fake firms. The court noted the applicant's clean criminal record and the prosecution's inability to effectively counter the defense submissions. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing a personal bond with sureties and restrictions against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. en-us Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423582 The HC granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(10)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 for alleged fraudulent ITC claims through fake firms. After being in custody since 29.09.2021, the court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of evidence connecting them to the alleged fake firms. The court noted the applicant's clean criminal record and the prosecution's inability to effectively counter the defense submissions. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing a personal bond with sureties and restrictions against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. Case-Laws GST Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423582