<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 422 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423581</link>
    <description>HC ruled that GST authorities must decide registration cancellation proceedings promptly when registration has been suspended, as indefinite suspension severely impacts business operations. Despite the petitioner&#039;s reply to the show cause notice in April 2022, authorities had not made a decision. The court directed authorities to conclude proceedings within 15 days, specifically considering the applicability of the proviso to Section 29(1) of CGST Act. If no decision was made within this timeframe, the registration suspension would automatically end. The petition was disposed of with the petitioner retaining the right to challenge any adverse order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 422 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423581</link>
      <description>HC ruled that GST authorities must decide registration cancellation proceedings promptly when registration has been suspended, as indefinite suspension severely impacts business operations. Despite the petitioner&#039;s reply to the show cause notice in April 2022, authorities had not made a decision. The court directed authorities to conclude proceedings within 15 days, specifically considering the applicability of the proviso to Section 29(1) of CGST Act. If no decision was made within this timeframe, the registration suspension would automatically end. The petition was disposed of with the petitioner retaining the right to challenge any adverse order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>