https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423580 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging an order under IGST Act, 2017, finding a violation of natural justice principles. The Court held that despite issuing a notice, the respondent failed to provide the petitioner with an actual personal hearing before passing an adverse order, contravening Section 75(4) of the GST Acts. The Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration after proper hearing, emphasizing that the statutory requirement for personal hearing is mandatory when an adverse decision is contemplated against a taxpayer. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423580 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging an order under IGST Act, 2017, finding a violation of natural justice principles. The Court held that despite issuing a notice, the respondent failed to provide the petitioner with an actual personal hearing before passing an adverse order, contravening Section 75(4) of the GST Acts. The Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration after proper hearing, emphasizing that the statutory requirement for personal hearing is mandatory when an adverse decision is contemplated against a taxpayer. Case-Laws GST Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423580