<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423550</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the review application, setting aside the previous orders of the CLB and the High Court. The Court found errors in the previous judgments, granting the Review Applicants the opportunity to re-present their petition under the Companies Act, 2013, to the National Company Law Tribunal for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:16:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423550</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the review application, setting aside the previous orders of the CLB and the High Court. The Court found errors in the previous judgments, granting the Review Applicants the opportunity to re-present their petition under the Companies Act, 2013, to the National Company Law Tribunal for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>