<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of Rs. 10 lakhs deposited during an investigation, determining the amount as a &#039;revenue deposit&#039; rather than duty, fine, or penalty. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund with 12% interest from the deposit date to the refund date under Section 35 FF, without any limitation period, directing the original authority to make the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of Rs. 10 lakhs deposited during an investigation, determining the amount as a &#039;revenue deposit&#039; rather than duty, fine, or penalty. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund with 12% interest from the deposit date to the refund date under Section 35 FF, without any limitation period, directing the original authority to make the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>