<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423536</link>
    <description>The case dealt with the applicability of Section 11B concerning a refund claim of service tax paid on reverse charge mechanism. The appellant&#039;s argument that the service tax was paid by mistake and not payable was dismissed. The court held that regardless of the tax&#039;s payable status, the appellant had paid it as service tax, making the refund claim subject to Section 11B. As the claim was filed after the stipulated one-year period, it was deemed time-barred. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423536</link>
      <description>The case dealt with the applicability of Section 11B concerning a refund claim of service tax paid on reverse charge mechanism. The appellant&#039;s argument that the service tax was paid by mistake and not payable was dismissed. The court held that regardless of the tax&#039;s payable status, the appellant had paid it as service tax, making the refund claim subject to Section 11B. As the claim was filed after the stipulated one-year period, it was deemed time-barred. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>