https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423531 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was refused where the parcel was addressed in the petitioner's name, carried his phone number, and the seizure with the FSL report showed 493.5 grams of MDMA treated as commercial quantity. Applying the rigour of Section 37(1)(b)(ii), the Court noted that bail could not be granted merely because co-accused had already been released, particularly when the alleged offence had wider societal impact and the investigation remained pending. On those materials, the petitioner was found not entitled to bail and the request was rejected. en-us Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:15:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423531 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was refused where the parcel was addressed in the petitioner's name, carried his phone number, and the seizure with the FSL report showed 493.5 grams of MDMA treated as commercial quantity. Applying the rigour of Section 37(1)(b)(ii), the Court noted that bail could not be granted merely because co-accused had already been released, particularly when the alleged offence had wider societal impact and the investigation remained pending. On those materials, the petitioner was found not entitled to bail and the request was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423531