<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423528</link>
    <description>The Court acquitted the petitioner in a Criminal Revision Case challenging a conviction order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court criticized the lower courts for relying solely on statutory presumptions and failing to consider other evidence. It found that the petitioner had substantiated a defense, setting aside the conviction and sentence. The judgment granted relief to the petitioner, emphasizing the rebuttable nature of statutory presumptions and the need for proper analysis of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423528</link>
      <description>The Court acquitted the petitioner in a Criminal Revision Case challenging a conviction order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court criticized the lower courts for relying solely on statutory presumptions and failing to consider other evidence. It found that the petitioner had substantiated a defense, setting aside the conviction and sentence. The judgment granted relief to the petitioner, emphasizing the rebuttable nature of statutory presumptions and the need for proper analysis of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>