https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302630 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was examined on delay, disclosure of relied-on materials, Section 108 Customs statements, custody and bail awareness, and Advisory Board procedure. The delay between the alleged smuggling activity and detention was explained by the investigation and did not snap the live link. Non-supply of WhatsApp chats, CCTV footage and similar unrelied materials did not violate the right to make an effective representation. Unretracted Section 108 statements could legitimately support subjective satisfaction, and the detaining authority was shown to have considered custody and likely release on bail. The Advisory Board hearing and its competence were upheld, so the detention stood. en-us Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:14:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302630 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was examined on delay, disclosure of relied-on materials, Section 108 Customs statements, custody and bail awareness, and Advisory Board procedure. The delay between the alleged smuggling activity and detention was explained by the investigation and did not snap the live link. Non-supply of WhatsApp chats, CCTV footage and similar unrelied materials did not violate the right to make an effective representation. Unretracted Section 108 statements could legitimately support subjective satisfaction, and the detaining authority was shown to have considered custody and likely release on bail. The Advisory Board hearing and its competence were upheld, so the detention stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302630