https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302629 Section 267 CrPC secures a prisoner's attendance before the criminal court but does not itself authorise remand; remand remains traceable only to Section 167. The court distinguished arrest from custody and held that arrest is not a prerequisite for judicial remand, because a person may come into custody on surrender or lawful production before the court. It further held that production under a production warrant does not make detention illegal if the court thereafter passes a valid judicial remand order. On that basis, the custody was not shown to be illegal and habeas corpus was unavailable. en-us Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:14:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302629 Section 267 CrPC secures a prisoner's attendance before the criminal court but does not itself authorise remand; remand remains traceable only to Section 167. The court distinguished arrest from custody and held that arrest is not a prerequisite for judicial remand, because a person may come into custody on surrender or lawful production before the court. It further held that production under a production warrant does not make detention illegal if the court thereafter passes a valid judicial remand order. On that basis, the custody was not shown to be illegal and habeas corpus was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302629