https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302615 In NIA investigations, the agency's throughout-India powers prevailed over the territorial limitation urged from Section 160 CrPC, so examination of the petitioner at Delhi on notice was valid. No enforceable right to the presence of an advocate was recognised for a person who was not an accused during interrogation, and the constitutional protections available to an accused were held inapplicable. The allegations of illegal detention, coercion, and self-harm were not supported by the record, so no judicial enquiry or compensation was warranted. The petition was dismissed on all substantive grounds. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:31:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302615 In NIA investigations, the agency's throughout-India powers prevailed over the territorial limitation urged from Section 160 CrPC, so examination of the petitioner at Delhi on notice was valid. No enforceable right to the presence of an advocate was recognised for a person who was not an accused during interrogation, and the constitutional protections available to an accused were held inapplicable. The allegations of illegal detention, coercion, and self-harm were not supported by the record, so no judicial enquiry or compensation was warranted. The petition was dismissed on all substantive grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302615