https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302614 Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 requires the Facilitation Council to attempt conciliation first and, if that fails, either arbitrate the dispute itself or refer it to an alternate dispute resolution institution. Because Section 24 gives the special scheme overriding effect, recourse to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not available before the Council when it acts under Section 18. The Council's role is confined to the statutory options in Section 18(3), and the general arbitration procedure cannot displace that mechanism. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 14:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302614 Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 requires the Facilitation Council to attempt conciliation first and, if that fails, either arbitrate the dispute itself or refer it to an alternate dispute resolution institution. Because Section 24 gives the special scheme overriding effect, recourse to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not available before the Council when it acts under Section 18. The Council's role is confined to the statutory options in Section 18(3), and the general arbitration procedure cannot displace that mechanism. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302614