<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1639 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302608</link>
    <description>A prior private arbitration agreement does not bar the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council from acting under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. The provision creates a special statutory mechanism: the Council first conducts conciliation and, if that fails, the dispute is referred to arbitration by the Council or an ADR institution as if there were an arbitration agreement under Section 7(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Because Sections 15 to 23 have overriding effect, this statutory procedure prevails over an earlier contractual arbitration clause for claims covered by the supplier&#039;s recovery of dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 14:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1639 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302608</link>
      <description>A prior private arbitration agreement does not bar the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council from acting under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. The provision creates a special statutory mechanism: the Council first conducts conciliation and, if that fails, the dispute is referred to arbitration by the Council or an ADR institution as if there were an arbitration agreement under Section 7(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Because Sections 15 to 23 have overriding effect, this statutory procedure prevails over an earlier contractual arbitration clause for claims covered by the supplier&#039;s recovery of dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>