https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302610 Interpretation of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 in relation to arbitration proceedings was found consistent with the statutory text. The SC accepted the interpretation adopted in the impugned order and held that no interference was warranted in special leave jurisdiction where the construction of the provision was fully justified. The Court also declined to examine other matters dealt with in the impugned order because they were not relevant to the controversy before it. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2022 14:14:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302610 Interpretation of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 in relation to arbitration proceedings was found consistent with the statutory text. The SC accepted the interpretation adopted in the impugned order and held that no interference was warranted in special leave jurisdiction where the construction of the provision was fully justified. The Court also declined to examine other matters dealt with in the impugned order because they were not relevant to the controversy before it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302610