<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 363 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423522</link>
    <description>An independent financial creditor in a consortium may maintain a Section 7 insolvency application even where the lead bank has already initiated SARFAESI and DRT proceedings, because such proceedings do not bar recourse under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The tribunal also noted that the applicant had independently sanctioned credit facilities and that no stay order existed. Debt and default were treated as established where the account was classified as non-performing, recall notice remained unpaid, and the application was otherwise complete, within limitation, and supported by the required disclosures, leading to admission of the corporate insolvency resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 363 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423522</link>
      <description>An independent financial creditor in a consortium may maintain a Section 7 insolvency application even where the lead bank has already initiated SARFAESI and DRT proceedings, because such proceedings do not bar recourse under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The tribunal also noted that the applicant had independently sanctioned credit facilities and that no stay order existed. Debt and default were treated as established where the account was classified as non-performing, recall notice remained unpaid, and the application was otherwise complete, within limitation, and supported by the required disclosures, leading to admission of the corporate insolvency resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>