<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 769 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302605</link>
    <description>Additional evidence was admitted under Rule 29 of the Income-tax Rules, 1963 because it was considered necessary for proper adjudication of the dispute. The assessment order and appellate order were set aside, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 769 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302605</link>
      <description>Additional evidence was admitted under Rule 29 of the Income-tax Rules, 1963 because it was considered necessary for proper adjudication of the dispute. The assessment order and appellate order were set aside, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>