<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 14 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29146</link>
    <description>Section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 overrides prior Hindu law, custom and usage, so the rule of primogeniture for an impartible estate survives only where it is specifically saved by section 5(ii). The Kathiawar covenant protected succession to the Gaddi according to law and custom, but did not preserve primogeniture for all properties of the former rulers. Accordingly, estates not covered by the statutory saving lost their impartible character, reverted to the incidents of joint Hindu family property, and the income could be assessed in the status of a Hindu undivided family rather than as the individual income of the holder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 14 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29146</link>
      <description>Section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 overrides prior Hindu law, custom and usage, so the rule of primogeniture for an impartible estate survives only where it is specifically saved by section 5(ii). The Kathiawar covenant protected succession to the Gaddi according to law and custom, but did not preserve primogeniture for all properties of the former rulers. Accordingly, estates not covered by the statutory saving lost their impartible character, reverted to the incidents of joint Hindu family property, and the income could be assessed in the status of a Hindu undivided family rather than as the individual income of the holder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>