https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423520 The Delhi HC granted relief regarding the freezing of bank accounts, noting that the provisional attachment order issued on 09.03.2020 had expired after its one-year validity period under Section 83 of the CGST Act. For remaining prayers concerning other matters, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application to include the jurisdictional commissionerate as a necessary party, as the current respondents lacked authority over those issues. The court directed all parties, including the involved banks, to act based on the digitally signed order and scheduled the next hearing for 31.08.2022. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423520 The Delhi HC granted relief regarding the freezing of bank accounts, noting that the provisional attachment order issued on 09.03.2020 had expired after its one-year validity period under Section 83 of the CGST Act. For remaining prayers concerning other matters, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application to include the jurisdictional commissionerate as a necessary party, as the current respondents lacked authority over those issues. The court directed all parties, including the involved banks, to act based on the digitally signed order and scheduled the next hearing for 31.08.2022. Case-Laws GST Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423520