<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 7 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29145</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the demand notice and allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the assessment order within six weeks. The Court emphasized the importance of proper service, stating that the right to appeal depends on being served in accordance with the law. The appeal will not be dismissed based on limitation, and the assessment merits will be determined by the AAC. The petition was allowed with costs, with both judges concurring on the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 7 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29145</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the demand notice and allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the assessment order within six weeks. The Court emphasized the importance of proper service, stating that the right to appeal depends on being served in accordance with the law. The appeal will not be dismissed based on limitation, and the assessment merits will be determined by the AAC. The petition was allowed with costs, with both judges concurring on the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>